

Today’s band directors are bombarded with information pertaining to the pedagogical and management functions of running a successful band program. The proportion of the information stream makes it understandable that many loose sight of the fact that all directors function as performers (conductors) as well as administrators and teachers. The need to explore a non-verbal language of communication, allowing the body to vividly respond to the detailed expressive expectations inherent in the music, is often lost in the struggle to juggle the many pedagogical concepts necessary to be “successful”.
The frequent result of this model for success is a teacher who may have five ways to explain a single articulation concept but only one way to physically demonstrate five different articulations. Such a verbal imbalance stimulates a cycle of rote teaching and limits rehearsal exploration to rhythmic organization, basic ensemble pedagogy, and defensive error detection. While each of these components of correctness is vital, they too often become the source of musical purpose since they are objective and provide tangible easy answers. “Is the rhythm correct?” “Is the ensemble together?” “Is it the right note?” All conductors desire the answer to these questions to be a resounding, “YES!” In objective ways, limiting gestural clarity to the basics of the beat may provide a secure level of comfort, such as a superior rating at contest, but it limits the subjective interaction vital for a truly expressive music making process which is the purpose of the ensembles inclusion in the fine arts curriculum.
In his book, The Composer’s Advocate, Erich Leinsdorf describes this objective manner of conducting as “musical navigation” and argues it is of minimal benefit to the composer’s intentions and the performers’ real needs. If showing a clear ictus, well defined beat patterns, inviting cues at new entrances, releases with emphatic clarity, and general dynamic changes are not good enough to meet the performer’s needs, then what does it take to be a “good” conductor? The answer can be found in striving to understand the creative balance between directing to secure an accurate performance and conducting to encourage an inspiring level of musical expressivity. A conductor who enlightens the musicians through a physical presentation of what is to be expressed, beyond what is commonly seen through the limitations of the musical notation, adds a subjective dimension of expressive musical leadership. This enlightenment is often called interpretation and it is as necessary to the musical experience as objective accuracy in performance.
A musical leader with a fully developed interpretation of the score should also be able to communicate the nuances of what is to be heard through a compelling and expressive gestural language. To establish a framework for expanding one’s capacity to communicate expressively through gesture, it might be helpful to review the following basic principles:
1. Contour yields contrast, which allows the communicated goal to be perceived.
Common gestural problems are
caused by trying to clarify gestures
with size utilizing the shoulder more
than the wrist. Size created through
the resulting tension causes two
specific communication problems: a) tension limits the
availability to move and thereby reduces the clarity of
the preparation, and b) this lack of clarity reduces the
contour and contrast of the gestural presentation and
the observer’s ability to respond. The conductor should
not be concerned with the amount of movement but
with appropriately matching the specific expectation
of what is to be heard. If everything is the same size it
loses meaning and clarity.
2. Quality versus Quantity of motion.
The principle of “Quality of motion” refers utilizing
the best possible motion to illustrate the musical
expectation with a specific and detailed gesture of
intention. This is in contrast to the concept of “Quantity
of motion” that describes a more general movement
that is less specific and detailed no matter its size.
These two extremes of motion can be easily visualized
by imagining two different ways of painting. First,
imagine a great painter carefully detailing a beautiful
landscape with a fine brush. Think about how this
artist would move in relation to the canvas in front
of them and how their movement would be initiated.
After creating this mental image, replicate it with
actual motion while thinking about the detail of each
gesture. In contrast, imagine painting the same artistic
vision on a canvas with a paint-roller. Observe the way
the body responds to the contrasting mental images
with ease in a manner that requires no instruction
beyond the imagery. The body need not wield a paintroller
if the intention is to paint a beautifully detailed
landscape. This response to the expectation provided
by the imagery is vital to understanding the principle
of quality motion and its connection to the details of
the interpreted score.
3. Be available to move.
At first glance, this may seem like a ridiculous
statement but upon further review it is a vital
component of quality motion as well as expressive
contour and contrast. To illustrate this principle,
engage in the following simple exercise. With your
right hand by your side, imagine that you will shake
someone’s hand. Clench your fist as tightly as possible
and move to shake hands. Does your arm feel heavy,
strained, and forced, or light, relaxed, and fluid? How
does added tension place limitations on the motion?
Shift the tension to your elbow and shoulder while
repeating the exercise. Notice the restriction caused
by tension! These limitations are not caused by the
intended goal but are created by the presence of
tension in the process. Although avoiding tension is
a simple idea it is one of the biggest challenges any
conductor faces. Tension is often mistakenly associated
with energy and emotion, both proven characteristics
of leadership. Removing tension from the most basic
of movements increases the availability of the body to
move to its full expressive capacity.
4. Action Point.
The action point identifies the place in space where
the intention of the gesture sparks action (attack) as
a result of preparation. Some examples that are easy
to imagine are: the stroke of a match being lit, the
impact of a golf club striking the ball on a tee, or the
point at which a thrown ball is released. The point
in space where preparation results in action defines
each of these distinctive gestures and is guided by
active changing and support in the torso. Review these
actions in your imagination and act each one of them
out several times. Notice how your body moves as a
unit through space with shape to support the desired
goal and how your eyes focus on the chosen action
point. The cycle of preparation that leads to action is a
significant part of how any conductor communicates.
The degree to which the entire body supports this cycle
as illustrated by these exercises will greatly determine
the success of gestural communication. Players at all
levels of accomplishment make decisions on how and
when to play between successive beat points. Action
is not isolated but inclusive when it is generated with
expressive preparation.
5. Efficient movement is
initiated at the point closest
to the action.
For the conductor, this is the
fingertips or by extension, the tip
of the baton. With baton in hand,
move from stillness. What moves
first? It should be the fingers. What
follows? The hand, the wrist, the
forearm, the upper arm, and the
shoulder in sequence, depending on
how much space must be covered.
Does your arm feel heavy or light
when this sequence is utilized? Light,
from relaxed fluidity. Now repeat
the motion but start the movement
in reverse order by moving the
shoulder first and engaging the arm
towards the fingers in reverse of
the natural order. Does your arm
feel heavy or light? Fixed, heavy,
strained, and perhaps forced, as a
result of the tension caused by the
unnatural order. Strike a match,
swing a golf club, or throw a ball
with similar reverse order and notice how this feels.
Pay attention to the manner in which the torso
becomes rigid and fixed in response to the tension
created by the unnatural motion.
How we live, react, and move in everyday situations provides great insight into how to become an effective and expressive conductor as well as fulfilling our many administrative and pedagogical obligations. Drawing upon our daily experience and the intuitive knowledge it provides can be a gateway to communicating complex ideas through common motions that are instinctively and instantaneously understood. The gestural language necessary is not a foreign language but one spoken daily by every one. Attaching these motions to the responsibility of musical leadership is both a craft that can be learned and an art that can be developed if one accepts as their mission to provide enlightened and expressive musical leadership (interpretation, insight, and inspiration), including clear navigational information, to stimulate an artistic experience through a commonly understood but unspoken language.